Craig Saunders is a brilliant writer. A man of diverse subjects ranging from Science Fiction to Horror to just plain strange. But as the saying goes The Writing Remains the Same: Clear, concise, thought provoking, interesting and sometimes humorous. Saunders has the true mark of a writer that will one day I am sure be a Writer. I have read his work for a few years now and I still think that The Seven Point Star is an under-appreciated work of art; horror and philosophy wrapped up in twisted tale of good and evil and where mankind fits.
1. When did you start writing horror?
First story I ever wrote (to completion,
anyway) - The Martyr's Tale. It was fantasy, mostly, but there were elements of
horror in there. It was a fairly simple story, a short, about an assassin who
makes a terrible mistake. But there was a snippet of his back story in a jail,
where the torturers liked to take out people's bones and sew back the flesh. I
think I wanted to write fantasy (I still like to) but mostly my mind takes a
darker turn, whether I want it to or not. It's like being left or right handed,
or gay or straight. You don't have a choice about stuff like that.
2. Have you written in any other genre?
I have. I still do. Hopefully I always
will. I write some comic noir kind of stuff (the Spiggot stories, the Sarah
House stories), some heroic fantasy (the Rythe stories). I prefer to write horror,
though. It's what's natural, for me. The fantasy is hardest, the comic stuff
somewhere in between. I find fantasy harder, because it's large, and that makes
it unwieldy and I really don't like to take notes or plan. I don't like to do
the same job twice, if I can help it. Writing longhand and transcribing onto a
PC is too cumbersome, for me, and plotting feels similar. It's a storyboard. So
you spend a long time sitting down and figuring it out, and then you have to go
back and write it all after you've done that. It seems a bit like painting by
numbers. I know the old carpenter's saying, measure twice, cut once. It's sound
advice, I'm sure, and it obviously works for others. It's just not for me. When
I come to the actual writing, having a plan turns it from fun to just another
chore.
3. What makes you uncomfortable?
Boxer shorts. You know, sometimes you're
walking, and your bits pop out, so you shuffle 'em round to get comfortable,
then you get where you're going and sit down and bam! you sit right on an
errant nut. Oh. OK.
I'm going to go ahead and assume you're
referring to horror, and mental rather than physical discomfort. I'm actually
pretty difficult to offend, but torture porn makes me uncomfortable - sure
there's a place for it, and others probably enjoy it, but I don't. But horror
stuff that actually freaks me out general concerns madness, rather than gore. Gore
doesn't worry me. Insanity does. Maybe casual, inescapable violence. Yes,
that's disturbing. I think Cormac McCarthy does that very well.
4. Does your family read your work?
Kids, nope. My wife reads everything, my
mum reads the ones that take her fancy. Some, like The Walls of Madness, my
wife complains about, then tells me off. 'You've gone too far,' she said about
that story, and plenty of others. Which I think means 'It's really good,' but I
don't really listen. Sounds very much like 'Have you fixed the shower', or 'Have
you taken out the bins'. I think she might be Portuguese, or maybe Spanish. I
don't know.
5. Does your writing make you uneasy?
Like the question above - number 3, if
memory serves - most of the time I try to write horror with a kind of hopeful
element, something uplifting, perhaps, though that's not quite it. But the
mental stuff, when the narrator is unreliable, perhaps. That's the stuff I find
harder to write - Bloodeye, The Walls of Madness...those kind of stories. The
Estate, maybe. They feel more personal, more troubling.
6. Who would you say you write like?
All sorts, I suppose. An agent once said I
write like Dashiell Hammett. But he didn't take the story on. So, a nice compliment
but ultimately pointless. Other people have said, content-wise, like Barker or
Gaiman. Some people have said Terry Pratchett. It's all nice and very pleasant,
but I don't necessarily think it's comparable. People write like themselves, I
think. Or, like so many other people it becomes moot, maybe. I don't know. I
write pretty short sentences, in short chapters, about horrific and/or
fantastic happenings. In a book. Does that help? Er. I give up. What's the answer?
7. Who are your favourite authors?
I like Charlie Huston an awful lot. I enjoyed
King, a few years ago, and still have a soft spot for him. I like Mieville and
Pratchett and Banks and Murakami. I don't think I'd want to marry any of them.
I like McMahon, McCammon, McBain...all the Mc's. Deininger and Curran I enjoy,
more often than not. I'm pretty eclectic in my tastes. I like Vonnegut more
than most, Heller, Williams (Tad), Child (Lee), Gemmell, Maugham, Alastair
Reynolds, Isaac Asimov, Sagan, Poul Anderson. Joe Abercrombie definitely
qualifies as a favourite, as does Eoin Colfer. I read anything by Garth Ennis
and Alan Moore and Mark Millar on the comic book side. I don't read much
non-fiction, outside of research, or poets. I like classic poetry more than
classic fiction. I used to try to read big fat tomes, or heavy books in other
ways, that were genius, classics, or touted as must-reads, because I thought it
would make be a better, more erudite reader. Melville and Dostoyevsky and Kafka
spring to mind. I didn't enjoy them. There are other writers people love that
just don't work for me. On the horror front, I don't really like Lovecraft or
Poe, either. Sorry! How terribly rude...
Now, I just read what I fancy and mostly
that turns out to be genre fiction. There are lots of writers I like very much.
Those mentioned above are just a few.
8. Who influences you as a writer?
Almost all of the things I've read over the
years, certainly, but at some point I think people just start writing the stories
they want, rather than the stories that they're re-interpreting. Do I think
that? I'm not sure. I'm going to try it out for a while, as a thought, and see
if it sticks...
All the authors I mentioned before. I'm
forty-two right now, and as a complete guess I must have read at least a few
thousand books. I think they all add something into your head, somewhere. Now,
I find the people that influence me on a conscious level (rather than in the
undermind where the thought-dwarves toil) are people who work at their craft
and the business of being a writer. People who are consistent and make a bit of
effort. Joe R. Lansdale, Matt Shaw, Ray Bradbury, J.A. Konrath, Stephen
King...people who work hard. Writing is easy enough, I think. Being successful,
it seems, involves either a bolt of lightning or putting in some hours. Kids these
day seem to want everything to be easy. Pfft. Kids these day.
Putting in some hours and earning your way seems
like something to aspire to. For me, anyway.
9.
Do you remember what your first horror book was that you read?
First 'horror', no. First 'gore', yes.
Michael Slade, Headhunter. My granddad had it on his bedside cabinet. As kids,
we'd go and stay with my nan and granddad, and sometimes he'd have a book on
the bedside cabinet. I'd sit under a dodgy electric blanket, with the bedside
light on, and read it. It didn't matter what it was on that bedside cabinet. If
it was granddad's, I'd read it. His books had things about lady-nipples and
soldier's intestines and occult rituals. They were dangerous books, exciting
books. At a young age (pretty young, though I don't remember the exact age) I'd
pick up books like that, or Dennis Wheatley or maybe Sven Hassel, but Louis
L'amour or Zane Grey, too.
10. How old were you?
Then? I don't strictly know. I remember
reading The Lord of the Rings around that time, too. The bedside cabinet of
illicit delights was in an old house of theirs, and they moved when I was
around ten or eleven, so sometime between the ages of eight and eleven. That's
a fair guess, but I might be off. My childhood memories are extremely
unreliable.
11. Is there any subject you will not touch as an
author?
Katy Perry, certainly. Otherwise, I don't
think a writer should censor themselves. There are plenty of other people to do
that for you, later on down the line. Like a good editor, a disgruntled reader,
or an Amazon-bot.
12. What was the best advice you were given as a
writer?
'Don't assume the reader knows what you do'.
About clarity, I suppose, and making assumptions as to what the reader will
'get'. Sometimes, of course, it's best to allow the reader to make those
assumptions, or read between the lines. But sometimes I'm just a wordy hack,
full of vague blather. My wife gave me that advice, and also the vague blather
line...I think. I don't speak Spanish, though.
13. If you had to start all over again, what
would you do different?
I
don't honestly know...maybe one thing, yes. I started out hitting up agents and
big publishers, like some wet-eared kid, hoping for that aforementioned bolt of
luck. I wasn't good enough, they weren't interested, and I had no background.
Imagine a garage band asking for a gig at a stadium. Wouldn't happen. I think
if I had known then that you really need to work at it, have a publication
history behind you, I wouldn't have wasted years. It was probably necessary to
learn that lesson. I suppose I wish I'd learned it a little bit sooner. I'm a
slow learner, though.
Of
course you can come straight out and self-publish. You can learn that way, or
not learn. But I think, still, that gatekeepers are useful. Editors, the good
ones, will give you feedback, tell you if a story is hot or cold. That's still
worth something. I didn't want to be a Kindle author, and never set out to be.
I still don't, though there's nothing wrong with it and I put books straight on
Amazon sometimes. But I like having a publisher behind me and that's what I
wanted and still do. If that's your goal, then at some point you're going to
have to get past an editor, and having a history will certainly help.
So,
yes, I'd do that differently. I'd work toward something, I think, rather than
simply hoping it would drop into my lap.
14. How many books do you read a year?
I used to read three or four a week, but
working seriously as a writer spoiled reading for pleasure for a while. I'm
only just starting to enjoy reading again. Currently, probably half a book a
week, maybe one a week, if I'm enjoying it and have the free time.
But between the ages of around ten and
thirty, probably an average of four a week. So, what's that? Maybe two hundred?
Over twenty years? Four thousand books, at a very sketchy estimate. But it's
not a competition. Now, like I said, I just read when I can be bothered, when I
want to, or if someone asks for an endorsement, maybe. I probably read no more
than fifty books a year now, some years maybe only ten. Like the 'write every
day' question below, I think other authors swear by reading a ton of books. I
think what works for you, personally, makes more sense. Stephen King's 'On
Writing', I seem to remember, said something along the lines of 'if you don't
read, you can't write.' He's not my real dad, though, so I don't have to listen
to him.
15. Do you write every day?
I know some writers adhere to this, too.
David Gemmell used to, Stephen King, Joe R. Lansdale. Sure, I try to. I like
to, even. But sometimes it's not possible or it's just not going to work. It's
fine to have a day, a week, a month off. As above, so below: what works for you
is fine. I don't think there are any rules to being a writer other than the
part where you actually have to write. Either way, I try not to be a grump
about it. I like writing, though, so mostly, if I'm able, I write every day.
Amazon
US author page: amazon.com/author/craigsaunders
Facebook
Page: facebook.com/craigrsaundersauthor
Twitter:
@grumblesprout
Blog:
craigrsaunders.blogspot.co.uk
Thank you Malina - always a pleasure ;) :D
ReplyDelete